Tue 30 Jun, 2009
War of the Roses: Part 1
Comments (1) Filed under: Medieval History, War History, War of the RosesTags: 1399, Black Prince, Edward, England, Henry IV, Henry V, Henry VI, knights, Lancaster, medieval, Richard II, Tudor, war, War of the Roses, York
I decided today that if there is no pertinent news relating to medieval history, I will choose a topic of my own interest instead. Read on if you wish, either way I am having fun writing
.
The War of the Roses is generally known to have taken place between 1455 and 1487. However, I like to start a little earlier than that. Let us go back to 1399, and the slight on Henry IV by Richard II.
After the death of John of Gaunt (Third son of Edward III, Father to Henry IV) in 1399, Henry was to to inherit his father’s title and lands. In an attempt to assert his authority, King Richard II decided to revoke Henry’s claim on the lands immediately upon John’s death. Richard instead demanded Henry to ask for the lands, suggesting the lands were not Henry’s to inherit, but Richards to give. A slight Henry would not take lightly.
Henry, after some reluctance, met with the former Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Arundel. The two conspired against Richard, and began a military campaign in England while Richard was away on his own military ventures in Ireland. With Arundel at Henry’s side, Henry began taking lands from all who opposed him, and very quickly gained enough support to declare himself Henry IV, King of England. Henry had Richard imprisoned, and and held his coronation on October 13th, 1399. Richard’s seven year old son and presumptive Edument de Mortimer would not take his father’s throne. Richard soon died in prison under mysterious circumstances.
Thus begins the the seeds that will later grow into the Wars of the Roses.
Sources:
Pollard, A.J.,” Late Medieval England 1399-1509.” New York: Longman, 2000.
Ian Mortimer, The Fears of Henry IV: the Life of England’s Self-Made King (Jonathan Cape, 2007)
Peter McNiven, “The Problem of Henry IV’s Health, 1405–1413″, English Historical Review, 100 (1985), pp 747–772

